How do we experience emotions and what is affect anyway?
In brief
As a
therapist, understanding the world of affective neuroscience offers tremendous
benefits. This post delves into the neural mechanisms behind emotions and
affect, providing valuable insights for therapeutic practice. By recognizing
the distinction between affect (immediate responses) and emotions (complex
experiences), we can gain a deeper understanding of our client’s emotional
experience. Exploring the attention spotlight and the salience network reveals
the relationship between emotions, affect and attention. Moreover,
understanding the ability to control attention towards affect and emotions
empowers therapists to help clients develop emotional regulation skills and
enhance their well-being.
I hope reading this post may generate curiosity and raise awareness about the relevance of neuroscience in the field of psychotherapy, recognizing that many therapists may not be familiar with this connection.
Closer Look
The field of affective neuroscience studies the neural
mechanisms underlying emotions, affect and the processes associated with them.
In this context, I want to emphasize the distinction between affect and
emotion, since they represent different aspects of the emotional experience.
Affect refers to the basic, automatic and immediate
emotional response that arises in response to a stimulus or situation. It is
often considered a preconscious, visceral [sensations of the body's internal
organs] and nonverbal experience of sensation, which can encompass a wide range
of valence (positive or negative) and arousal (level of activation). Affect is
closely related to bodily sensations and can be thought of as a raw and primal
emotional response that occurs before cognitive evaluation and conscious
labeling of specific emotions. We feel the physical aspect through the sense /
ability of introspection.
In the study of how the brain works, researchers in
affective neuroscience have found that there are different types of brain
activity associated with specific affects. One model of categorizing these
affects is into groups such as seeking/desire, lust, fear, and anger. Another
approach is to consider two dimensions called valence (positive or negative)
and arousal (intensity). These different affects / dimensions (depending on
which model) are linked to distinct networks of neurons. There is a lot of
ongoing research happening in this field to further our understanding.
Emotion, on the other hand, involves a more complex and
conscious experience, involving cognitive appraisal, subjective feelings, and
conscious recognition of specific emotions (eg, fear, happiness, anger).
Emotions are often associated with specific events or situations, and involve
higher-level processing, such as interpreting, evaluating, and labeling the
emotional experience.
“Emotions are
constructions of the world, not reactions to it.”
Barrett L. F. (2017, p. 17)
The brain creates meaning by predicting and adjusting
to incoming sensations. It categorizes these sensations based on past
experiences and responses so that they are useful in a specific context and
have meaning - we call these emotions. For example, when the brain uses past
experiences of happiness to categorize and guide our actions based on predicted
sensory information, we then perceive or experience happiness. If we want to
get really accurate, our perception is also influenced by what we're currently
doing and what we expect to do in the future. It's like a clever brain game
called predictive coding, quite different from the old, traditional model of
stimuli leading to thoughts and then immediate responses. But hold on tight,
because maybe we'll dive deeper into this fascinating topic in a future post!
The emotion is similar to a colorful and rich story
that we experience according to the information that reaches different areas of
the brain through what is illuminated by the attention spotlight. It begins in
the affect networks, but interpretations, connections and memories are added to
it. Emotional experience includes words and affects our various behaviors.
Let's delve into the concept of attention, specifically
when it comes to affect. We can associate this attention with a network known
as the salience network. The salience network is a network of brain regions
that allows us to identify important stimuli and directs our attention to them,
playing a crucial role in filtering sensory information and focusing cognitive
resources. It detects salient events and signals the brain's attention systems,
influencing what captures our attention and shaping our cognitive and
behavioral responses. The salience network is particularly important in the
recognition and processing of emotions because it helps identify emotionally
relevant stimuli. When we encounter an emotionally relevant stimulus, the
salience network will activate and send signals to other brain regions involved
in emotion processing, such as the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex. The
prefrontal cortex may then regulate the emotion, such as inhibiting the amygdala
response or creating a more adaptive response.
The salience network can be likened to a spotlight that
illuminates the crucial information in our environment and the activated
feelings within us through the affect networks. This attentional spotlight
assists us in directing our focus towards the most relevant information, while
the salience network ensures that the spotlight remains on the pertinent
details. Our emotions also have an influence on the attentional spotlight. For
instance, when experiencing happiness, we tend to concentrate more on
positively valenced information, whereas sadness may direct our attention
towards negatively valenced information.
However, if we lack the ability to voluntarily shift
our attention, several outcomes may arise. Our attention might become
excessively fixated on an affect network, intensifying the impact of affect and
amplifying the emotional response. Alternatively, we may struggle to
effectively process the information conveyed by the affect networks due to our
inability to direct our attention towards our affect, resulting in a potential
dampening of our overall emotional experience.
While affect, the core of our emotional experiences, is
often considered automatic, non-conscious, we possess the capacity to exert
control over the flexibility of our attention towards affect and the way we
process and pay attention to our emotions. From a neurological perspective,
this control is associated with the ability to modify the functional
connectivity between the relevant neural networks involved in emotional
processing. Through conscious effort and practice, we can shape and regulate
our emotional experiences by modulating the connections between different brain
regions involved in emotion regulation, such as the prefrontal cortex,
amygdala, and insula. This neuroplasticity allows us to develop greater
self-awareness, emotional regulation skills, and the ability to navigate our
emotions in a more adaptive and constructive manner. By actively engaging in
strategies like mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal, or therapeutic
interventions, we can influence the connectivity of these networks and enhance
our control over our emotional responses, leading to improved well-being and
emotional resilience.
Barrett L. F. (2017). The theory of constructed
emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization.
Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 12(1), 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw154
Barrett, L. F. (2020). Seven and a half lessons about
the brain. Houghton Mifflin.
Pessoa, L. (2013). The cognitive-emotional brain: From
interactions to integration. MIT press.
Posner, J., Russell, J. A., Gerber, A., Gorman, D.,
Colibazzi, T., Yu, S., Wang, Z., Kangarlu, A., Zhu, H., & Peterson, B. S.
(2009). The neurophysiological bases of emotion: An fMRI study of the affective
circumplex using emotion-denoting words. Human brain mapping, 30(3), 883–895.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20553
Vuilleumier P. (2005). How brains beware: neural
mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(12),
585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011
תגובות
הוסף רשומת תגובה